EXPLANATION TO SEC.73: A DEEMING PROVISION
IMPLICATIONS OF SECTION 2(22)(e)
STAY OF DEMAND
APPARENT CONTRADICTION IN THREE JUDGEMENT OF THE SUPREME COURT ON CAPITAL & REVENUE EXPENDITURE AND THEIR RECONCILIATION
JUDICIAL PRECEDENTS – THEIR BINDING FORCE AND THEIR REVIEW
REAL ESTATE TRANSACTIONS IN INCOME TAX ACT, 1961